Synopsis: Montgomery was convicted of possession of pseudo ephedrine with intent to manufacture methamphetamine. Did a jury instruction on missing witnesses or opinion testimony on his intent deprive him of a fair trial and should the court have considered imposing an unrequested first time offender sentencing waiver?
Synopsis: Did a police officer properly cite a motorcyclist for reckless driving outside his department’s jurisdiction and then provide opinion testimony during the man’s trial?
Tags: Arrest, Criminal Law, Emergency, Erratic Driving, Evidence, Extraterritorial Arrest, Guilt or Innocence, Issues Not Raised in Trial Court, Manifest Constitutional Error, Opinion Evidence, Review, What Constitutes
