Temple of Justice

The history, people, and cases of the Washington State Supreme Court
  • Home
  • Arguments
    • Recent Arguments
    • Upcoming Arguments
    • On The Road
  • Decisions
    • Recent Opinions
    • Landmark Cases
    • Annual Summary of Decisions
  • Justices
    • Justice Gallery
    • Chief Justice Gallery
    • Justice Charles Johnson
    • Chief Justice Barbara Madsen
    • Justice Gerry Alexander
    • Justice Richard Sanders
    • Justice Tom Chambers
    • Justice Susan Owens
    • Justice Mary Fairhurst
    • Justice James Johnson
    • Justice Debra Stephens
  • Courts
    • Madsen1 Court (2010-)
    • Alexander4 Court (2008-2009)
    • Alexander3 Court (2005-2007)
    • Alexander2 Court (2003-2004)
    • Alexander1 Court (2001-2002)
    • Other Courts
  • Advocates
  • Collections
    • Audio Archives
    • Image Archives
    • Favorites
    • Special Events
    • Washington Reports
    • Washington Reports, 2d Series
  • About
    • Contributors
    • Disclaimer
    • The Building
    • The Website
    • Historical Society

Archive

Posts Tagged ‘Exceptions’

TRAVIS v. LAWRENSON

Monday, January 26, 1891 1891 Decisions
Tags: Appeal, County Commissioners, Exceptions, Illegal Contract

CUNNINGHAM v. SEATTLE ELEC. RY. & POWER CO.

Tuesday, January 12, 1892 1892 Decisions
Tags: Appeal, Carriers, Ejection of Passenger, Exceptions, Instructions

HOWE v. KENYON

Friday, August 12, 1892 1892 Decisions
Tags: Appeal, Attorney and Client, Contract For Fees, Exceptions, Statement of Facts

MALING v. CRUMMEY

Friday, November 18, 1892 1892 Decisions
Tags: Exceptions, Gaming, Instructions, Scope of Title, Statutes

In re Pers. Restraint of McKiearnan v. State

Tuesday, January 13, 2009 2009 Arguments, Winter 2009

Synopsis: May a defendant collaterally challenge a conviction more than one year after the judgment becomes final when the defendant’s maximum possible sentence was misstated on the judgment and sentence form?

Tags: Erroneous Maximum Sentence, Exceptions, Facial Invalidity, Personal Restraint, Petition, Statutory Limits, Timeliness

In re Pers. Restraint of Clark v. State

Thursday, September 17, 2009 2009 Arguments, Fall 2009

Synopsis: Has the petitioner shown that his sentence was facially invalid, so that the Court may hear his petition? If so, can he withdraw his prior guilty plea if he agreed in it to a sentence not authorized by law?

Tags: Exceptions, Facial Invalidity, Order Correcting Judgment, Personal Restraint, Petition, Statutory Limits, Timeliness, What Constitutes
RSS
  • Google
  • My Yahoo!
  • newsgator
  • Bloglines
Podcast Twitter

 

March 2010
S M T W T F S
« Feb    
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031  

Categories

Archives

Popular Cases

  • Washington v. Gunwall (6)
  • Washington v. Casal (2)
  • Love v. King County (2)
  • Rhinehart v. The Seattle Times Company (2)
  • Troxel v. Granville (2)
  • Ames v. Wash. State Health Dep't Med. Quality Assurance Comm'n (2)
  • Senear v. The Daily Journal-American (2)
  • State v. Thomas (2)
  • State v. Bunker (2)
  • Waples v. Lakewood Dental Clinic (2)

Tags

Appeal Attachment Community Property Constitutional Law Contracts Corporations Criminal Law Damages Divorce Due Process Effect Estoppel Evidence Former Jeopardy Harmless Error Homicide Information Instructions Insurance Involuntary Commitment Judgment Jurisdiction Landlord and Tenant Mechanics' Liens Miscellaneous Municipal Corporations Necessity Negligence Notice Parties Pleading Proof Public Lands Punishment Sale Scope Searches and Seizures Sentence Statement of Facts Statutes Sufficiency Taxation Trial Validity What Constitutes

Meta

  • Log in
Top WordPress

Creative Commons License

A joint venture of The Oyez Project and Washington State University.
Valid XHTML 1.1 and CSS 3.