Docket No. 84044-0 (from Court of Appeals Division I Case No. 61671-4) Facts: Following respondent Kenneth Treiger’s separation from his wife J’Amy Owens and pending the dissolution of their marriage, Owens purchased a home. When Treiger and Owens both subsequently filed for bankruptcy, the Superior Court for King County entered a decree dissolving the marriage but staying distribution of community property until the conclusion of the bankruptcy proceedings. After the bankruptcy court determined that the home that Owens purchased is community property, the superior court ordered the sale of the home and ruled that Treiger is entitled to half of the proceeds. The superior court also issued supplemental documents awarding Treiger attorney’s fees and an additional share of the proceeds of the home, fining Owens for failing to sign an agreement listing the home for sale, and giving Treiger the authority to close the sale of the home In the interim, the Retail Group, a business of which Owens is a part owner, had defaulted on a promissory note and borrowing agreement with petitioner Bank of America, which obtained a judgment against Owens. Bank of America subsequently petitioned the Superior Court for King County for a declaratory judgment determining the priority of its interest in the proceeds of the sale of the home. The superior court ruled that the earlier order awarding Treiger half of the proceeds of the sale of the home did not grant Treiger a lien or any other interest in the property and that Bank of America’s lien therefore has first priority. Continue reading
Blog Archives
Washington v. Webb
Docket No. 81314-1 (from Court of Appeals Division I Case No. 59626-8) Facts: Petitioner Michael Webb was convicted for presenting a fraudulent insurance claim and filed a notice of appeal, but died shortly after he was sentenced. Webb’s appointed counsel moved for abatement of Webb’s conviction, and the Court of Appeals dismissed the appeal and declined to abate the conviction or any of the monetary amounts Webb was ordered to pay. The Supreme Court of Washington accepted Webb’s counsel’s petition for discretionary review. Continue reading
Wachovia S.B.A. Lending, Inc. v. Kraft
Docket No. 80318-8 (from Court of Appeals Division III Case No. 34714-8) Facts: After petitioner Deanna Kraft’s former husband filed for bankruptcy and ceased making payments pursuant to a small business loan made by respondent Wachovia S.B.A. Lending, Inc. that Kraft had co-signed, Wachovia filed suit against Kraft in the Superior Court for Pierce County seeking to recover the deficiency. Continue reading
Transamerican Capital Corporation v. Gervin
Docket No. 81005-2 (from Pierce Case No. 96-2-11938-1) Facts: A judgment against petitioner George Gervin was entered in a Texas court after Gervin failed to repay loans to respondent Transamerican Capital Corporation. Transamerican Capital Corporation subsequently registered the foreign judgment with the Superior Court for Pierce County Continue reading
Washington v. Eggleston
Docket No. 77756-0 (from Court of Appeals Division II Case No. 29915-1) Facts: Following a first trial in which the jury was unable to reach a verdict and a conviction following a second trial that was reversed upon appeal, a third trial resulted in petitioner Brian Eggleston being convicted of second degree murder and assault in the Superior Court for Pierce County and sentenced to an exceptional sentence. Eggleston subsequently appealed his sentence, asserting that collateral estoppel barred the respondent state of Washington from seeking an exceptional sentence Continue reading
United Collection Service, Inc. v. Shepherd
Docket No. 77974-1 (from Court of Appeals Division I Case No. 54017-3) Facts: American Discount Corporation assigned a judgment obtained against respondent Austin Shepherd and his wife Joy in 1986 to petitioner United Collection Service, Inc., which in 1996 obtained an order extending the judgment for ten years pursuant to Washington Revised Code §6.17.020. After United Collection Service subsequently moved to appoint an appraiser for the Shepherds’ real property upon which an execution had been levied, Shepherd moved to set aside the order extending the judgment as void. Shepherd cited J.D. Tan, L.L.C. v. Summers, in which the Washington Court of Appeals held that, prior to its 2002 amendment, §6.17.020 only authorized original creditors to obtain orders extending judgments. Continue reading
Little v. King
Docket No. 77560-5 (from Court of Appeals Division I Case No. 53440-8) Facts:
Respondent insured driver Lisa Little filed action for damages after sustaining personal injuries from a motor vehicle accident caused by petitioner uninsured negligent driver Annie King. The accident occurred while Little was driving on work-related business, so Little’s counsel notified the employer’s insurer St. Paul Insurance Company of potential liability expenses because of the employer’s uninsured motorist coverage. St. Paul took no action to intervene as an interested party at risk of liability. Continue reading