Washington v. Ford

Docket No. 83617-5 (from Court of Appeals Division II Case No. 37089-1)  Facts: Following jury deliberations in respondent Tyrone Ford’s trial on two charges of third degree child rape in the Superior Court for Clark County, the jury initially returned a verdict of guilty on the second charge but left the verdict form for the first charge blank. After being instructed by the judge to enter a verdict, the jury returned to the jury room and subsequently found Ford guilty of the first charge as well. Continue reading

In re detention of Pouncy

Docket No. 81769-3 (from Court of Appeals Division I Case No. 59034-1)  Facts: The petitioner state of Washington petitioned the Superior Court for King County to have respondent Curtis Pouncy committed as a sexually violent predator pursuant to Washington Revised Code §71.09, asserting that Pouncy suffered from a personality disorder that made him likely to commit predatory acts of sexual violence if not confined. Continue reading

Washington v. Bennett

Docket No. 78377-2 (from Court of Appeals Division II Case No. 32896-8)  Facts:  Petitioner Bruce Bennett was convicted of first degree escape in the Superior Court for Clallam County.  Bennett subsequently appealed his conviction, asserting that the instruction given to the jury regarding the burden of proof, which was first used in the case of Washington v. Castle, denied him due process insofar as it undermined the presumption of innocence. Continue reading

Washington v. Coleman

Docket No. 77706-3 (from Court of Appeals Division I Case No. 54171-4)  Facts:  Petitioner John Coleman was convicted of two counts of child molestation arising from his alleged molestation of two children over a period of three years.  Coleman subsequently appealed his convictions, asserting that the trial court erred in failing to include a unanimity instruction in its instructions to the jury.  The Washington Court of Appeals reversed one of Coleman’s convictions but affirmed the other, holding that as the state of Washington had not emphasized specific incidents of molestation involving one of the alleged victims, a unanimous verdict on a specific criminal act was not required to convict Coleman of molesting her. Continue reading