Washington v. Morales

Docket No. 84197-7 (from Court of Appeals Division II Case No. 36941-9)  Facts:  After petitioner Jose Morales crashed into another motorist in his automobile and fled the scene, he was arrested by a state trooper.  Because the trooper found evidence that Morales was under the influence of alcohol, he transported Morales to a hospital in order to have a blood alcohol test performed.  Due to the fact that Morales speaks limited English, the trooper instructed an interpreter to inform Morales, as required by Washington Revised Code §46.20.308, that he would be subject to a blood alcohol test and that he had a right to an independent test.  After a trial in which the results of the blood alcohol test were admitted into evidence, Morales was convicted of hit and run, driving under the influence of alcohol, and vehicular assault by driving a motor vehicle under the influence of intoxicating liquor and in a reckless manner.  Morales appealed his convictions, asserting that the results of the blood alcohol test were inadmissible insofar as the state failed to prove that he had been apprised of his rights under §46.20.308 given that the interpreter had not testified at trial. Continue reading

Washington v. Grenning

Docket No. 81449-0 (from Court of Appeals Division II Case No. 32426-1)  Facts:  Respondent Neil Grenning was convicted of multiple counts of child rape, sexual exploitation of a minor, child molestation, and possession of child pornography in the Superior Court for Pierce County.  Grenning subsequently appealed his convictions for possession of child pornography, asserting that restrictions imposed by the trial court upon his attorneys’ access to his computer following its seizure denied him access to critical evidence to which he was entitled in violation of Washington State Court Rule 4.7(a) and the 5th and 6th Amendments to the United States Constitution. Continue reading

Washington v. Warren

Docket No. 79356-5  Facts: Petitioner Richard Warren was convicted in separate trials of one count of first degree child molestation of his younger stepdaughter and three counts of second degree child rape of his older stepdaughter in the Superior Court for King County. Warren subsequently appealed his convictions, asserting that the prosecutor committed misconduct during closing arguments in both trials Continue reading

Washington v. Hatchie

Docket No. 78889-8  Facts:  Petitioner Raymond Hatchie was convicted of unlawful manufacture of a controlled substance after being denied a motion to suppress the evidence of methamphetamine manufacturing equipment seen by police in his home when they were looking for a suspect pursuant to an arrest warrant. Continue reading