The following opinions were reported in Washington Reports, Volume 9.
- ABERNETHY v. TOWN OF MED. LAKE, 9 Wash. 112 (1894)
- AGASSIZ v. KELLEHER, 9 Wash. 656 (1894)
- ALLEN & POWELL v. CATLIN, 9 Wash. 603 (1894)
- ALLEN v. GRIMES, 9 Wash. 424 (1894)
- ALLEN v. HIGGINS, 9 Wash. 446 (1894)
- ANDERSON v. GUINEAU, 9 Wash. 304 (1894)
- ASKAM v. KING COUNTY, 9 Wash. 1 (1894)
- AULTMAN, MILLER & CO. v. MILLS, 9 Wash. 68 (1894)
- BALL v. CITY OF TACOMA, 9 Wash. 592 (1894)
- BERGMAN v. SHOUDY, 9 Wash. 331 (1894)
- BIERER v. BLUROCK, 9 Wash. 63 (1894)
- BLACKWELL v. McLEAN, 9 Wash. 301 (1894)
- BOWER v. BAGLEY, 9 Wash. 642 (1894)
- BOWMAN v. FIRST NAT’L BANK OF SPOKANE, 9 Wash. 614 (1894)
- BROOKS v. SKOOKUM MFG. CO., 9 Wash. 80 (1894)
- BUCKLEY v. CITY OF TACOMA, 9 Wash. 253 (1894)
- BUCKLEY v. CITY OF TACOMA, 9 Wash. 269 (1894)
- CASE v. HAM, 9 Wash. 54 (1894)
- CHAPPELL v. WOODS, 9 Wash. 134 (1894)
- CITY OF NEW WHATCOM v. BELLINGHAM BAY IMPROVEMENT CO., 9 Wash. 639 (1894)
- CLOUD v. TOWN OF SUMAS, 9 Wash. 399 (1894)
- COLE v. SATSOP R.R. CO., 9 Wash. 487 (1894)
- COLLINS v. SNOKE, 9 Wash. 566 (1894)
- COONEY v. GREAT NORTHERN RY. CO., 9 Wash. 292 (1894)
- COSH-MURRAY CO. v. ADAIR, 9 Wash. 686 (1894)
- COUNTY OF SPOKANE v. ALLEN, 9 Wash. 229 (1894)
- CURRY v. CATLIN, 9 Wash. 495 (1894)
- D. M. OSBORNE & CO. v. COLUMBIA COUNTY FARMERS’ ALLIANCE, 9 Wash. 666 (1894)
- DAVIS v. FIELDS, 9 Wash. 78 (1894)
- DEBENTURE CORP. v. WARREN, 9 Wash. 312 (1894)
- DONAHUE v. JOHNSON, 9 Wash. 187 (1894)
- FERRY v. FERRY, 9 Wash. 239 (1894)
- FISHER v. FISHER, 9 Wash. 694 (1894)
- GOFF v. PACIFIC COAST S.S. CO., 9 Wash. 386 (1894)
- GRAETZ v. McKENZIE, 9 Wash. 696 (1893)
- GREER v. SQUIRE, 9 Wash. 359 (1894)
- HAMAR v. PETERSON, 9 Wash. 152 (1894)
- HART v. NIAGARA FIRE INS. CO., 9 Wash. 620 (1894)
- HARTSON v. DALE, 9 Wash. 379 (1894)
- HERRIN v. PUGH, 9 Wash. 637 (1894)
- HOWARD v. McNAUGHT, 9 Wash. 355 (1894)
- HUGHES v. BRAVINDER, 9 Wash. 595 (1894)
- In re Honora T. Cleary, 9 Wash. 605 (1894)
- In re Smith, 9 Wash. 85 (1894)
- KELLEY & BRODOCK v. GREENOUGH, 9 Wash. 659 (1894)
- KOCH v. SACKMAN-PHILLIPS INV. CO., 9 Wash. 405 (1894)
- LA FRANCE FIRE ENGINE CO. v. DAVIS, 9 Wash. 600 (1894)
- LA FRANCE FIRE ENGINE CO. v. TOWN OF MT. VERNON, 9 Wash. 142 (1894)
- LIVESLEY v. PIER, 9 Wash. 658 (1894)
- LOVELL v. HOUSE OF THE GOOD SHEPHERD, 9 Wash. 419 (1894)
- MARX v. PARKER, 9 Wash. 473 (1894)
- MATSON v. PORT TOWNSEND SOUTHERN R.R. CO., 9 Wash. 449 (1894)
- MATSON v. PORT TOWNSEND SOUTHERN R.R. CO., 9 Wash. 529 (1894)
- MERCHANTS NAT’L BANK OF TACOMA v. PEET, 9 Wash. 237 (1894)
- MERRYWEATHER v. SCHOOL DIST. NO. 34, 9 Wash. 5 (1894)
- MITCHELL v. TACOMA RY. & MOTOR CO., 9 Wash. 120 (1894)
- MUNCH v. McLAREN, 9 Wash. 676 (1894)
- McALLISTER v. TACOMA, 9 Wash. 272 (1894)
- McENEANEY v. DART, 9 Wash. 682 (1894)
- McKENZIE v. PUGET SOUND NAT’L BANK OF SEATTLE, 9 Wash. 442 (1894)
- McKENZIE v. WOODIN, 9 Wash. 414 (1894)
- NEIS v. FARQUHARSON, 9 Wash. 508 (1894)
- NOYES v. LOUGHEAD, 9 Wash. 325 (1894)
- OLIVER v. LEWIS, 9 Wash. 572 (1894)
- OLSON v. McMURRAY CEDAR LUMBER CO., 9 Wash. 500 (1894)
- OLSON v. VEAZIE, 9 Wash. 481 (1894)
- PACKARD v. DELFEL, 9 Wash. 562 (1894)
- PARSONS v. PEARSON, 9 Wash. 48 (1894)
- PETERS v. MONT, 9 Wash. 383 (1894)
- PETERSON v. SAYWARD, 9 Wash. 503 (1894)
- PETERSON v. WOOLERY, 9 Wash. 390 (1894)
- PETERSON v. WRIGHT, 9 Wash. 202 (1894)
- POTVIN v. DENNY HOTEL CO., 9 Wash. 316 (1894)
- POTWIN v. BLASHER, 9 Wash. 460 (1894)
- QUINN v. PARKE & LACY MACH. CO., 9 Wash. 136 (1894)
- RATHBONE, SARD & CO. v. FROST, 9 Wash. 162 (1894)
- RAYMOND v. MORRISON, 9 Wash. 156 (1894)
- REDFORD v. SPOKANE ST. RY. CO., 9 Wash. 55 (1894)
- REICHEL v. JEFFREY, 9 Wash. 250 (1894)
- RICE v. STEVENS, 9 Wash. 298 (1894)
- RIGNEY v. TACOMA LIGHT & WATER CO., 9 Wash. 245 (1894)
- RIGNEY v. TACOMA LIGHT & WATER CO., 9 Wash. 576 (1894)
- ROBERTS v. WASHINGTON NAT’L BANK, 9 Wash. 12 (1894)
- ROGERS v. CITY OF SPOKANE, 9 Wash. 168 (1894)
- SANDERS v. MAIN & WINCHESTER, 9 Wash. 46 (1894)
- SAVINGS, LOAN & BUILDING CO. v. JONES, 9 Wash. 434 (1894)
- SAYWARD v. THAYER, 9 Wash. 22 (1894)
- SEARS v. WILLIAMS, 9 Wash. 428 (1894)
- SEATTLE v. LIBERMAN, 9 Wash. 276 (1894)
- SEWARD v. SPURGEON, 9 Wash. 74 (1894)
- SNOHOMISH COUNTY ABSTRACT CO. v. ANDERSON, 9 Wash. 349 (1894)
- STANS v. BAITEY, 9 Wash. 115 (1894)
- STATE v. CALDWELL, 9 Wash. 336 (1894)
- STATE v. GASCH, 9 Wash. 226 (1894)
- STATE v. HOEPPNER, 9 Wash. 680 (1894)
- STATE v. HOLMES, 9 Wash. 528 (1894)
- STATE v. LARGENT, 9 Wash. 691 (1894)
- STATE v. MANNING, 9 Wash. 695 (1894)
- STATE v. MAYBERRY, 9 Wash. 193 (1894)
- STATE v. MEYERS, 9 Wash. 8 (1894)
- STATE v. MURPHY, 9 Wash. 204 (1894)
- STATE v. OLESON, 9 Wash. 186 (1894)
- STATE v. PARKER, 9 Wash. 653 (1894)
- STATE v. PRINCE, 9 Wash. 107 (1894)
- STATE v. REIS, 9 Wash. 329 (1894)
- STATE v. SMITH, 9 Wash. 195 (1894)
- STATE v. SMITH, 9 Wash. 248 (1894)
- STATE v. SMITH, 9 Wash. 341 (1894)
- STATE v. SUPERIOR COURT OF KING COUNTY, 9 Wash. 369 (1894)
- STATE v. SUPERIOR COURT OF PIERCE COUNTY, 9 Wash. 668 (1894)
- STATE v. SUPERIOR COURT OF SKAGIT COUNTY, 9 Wash. 673 (1894)
- STATE v. SUPERIOR COURT OF THURSTON COUNTY, 9 Wash. 366 (1894)
- STATE v. SUPERIOR COURT OF YAKIMA COUNTY, 9 Wash. 307 (1894)
- STATE v. TWICHELL, 9 Wash. 530 (1894)
- STATE v. WHITEMAN, 9 Wash. 402 (1894)
- STATE v. WHITNEY, 9 Wash. 377 (1894)
- STATE v. WILSON, 9 Wash. 16 (1894)
- STATE v. WILSON, 9 Wash. 218 (1894)
- STATE v. WRIGHT, 9 Wash. 96 (1894)
- STICKLER v. GILES, 9 Wash. 147 (1894)
- TACOMA NAT’L BANK v. PEET, 9 Wash. 222 (1894)
- THOMPSON v. TOWN OF SUMNER, 9 Wash. 310 (1894)
- THYGESEN v. NEUFELDER, 9 Wash. 455 (1894)
- TIMES PUBL. CO. v. CITY OF EVERETT, 9 Wash. 518 (1894)
- TINGLEY v. FAIRHAVEN LAND CO., 9 Wash. 34 (1894)
- TOWN OF ELMA v. CARNEY, 9 Wash. 466 (1894)
- TOWN OF HAMILTON v. CHOPARD, 9 Wash. 352 (1894)
- TRUMBULL v. JACKMAN, 9 Wash. 524 (1894)
- TUCKER v. BROWN, 9 Wash. 357 (1894)
- TURNER v. BELLINGHAM BAY LUMBER & MFG. CO., 9 Wash. 484 (1894)
- VOLLRATH v. CROWE, 9 Wash. 374 (1894)
- WAITE v. STROUD, 9 Wash. 333 (1894)
- WALDRON v. HOME MUT. INS. CO., 9 Wash. 534 (1894)
- WALES v. DENNIS, 9 Wash. 308 (1894)
- WARBURTON v. RALPH, 9 Wash. 537 (1894)
- WASHINGTON NAT’L BANK OF SEATTLE v. COUNTY OF KING, 9 Wash. 607 (1894)
- WATSON v. PUGH, 9 Wash. 665 (1894)
- WEBB v. COUNTY OF SPOKANE, 9 Wash. 103 (1894)
- WHITEHOUSE v. POINT DEFIANCE, TACOMA & EDISON RY. CO., 9 Wash. 558 (1894)
- WHITING v. COLLIER, 9 Wash. 412 (1894)
- WILKESON COAL & COKE CO. v. DRIVER, 9 Wash. 177 (1894)
- WINTER v. SHOUDY, 9 Wash. 52 (1894)
- ZINTEK v. STIMSON MILL CO., 9 Wash. 395 (1894)