Category Archives: On The Road
State v. Johnson
Clark v. Smith Bunday Berman Britton
Seattle v. May
Docket No. 83677-9 Facts: Petitioner Robert May was convicted in the Seattle Municipal Court of violating a no contact order that prohibited him from contacting his former wife. May appealed his conviction, asserting that the no contact order was invalid insofar as the superior court that issued it failed to make the required finding that he was likely to resume acts of domestic violence that was necessary for the duration of the order to extend beyond one year and that the no contact order failed to provide notice that violating it would be a criminal offense. Continue reading
Washington v. Martin
Docket No. 83709-1 Facts: Petitioner Timothy Martin was convicted of kidnapping and robbery in the Superior Court for Snohomish County after a trial in which the prosecutor implied during their cross-examination of Martin that Martin had tailored his testimony in response to the testimony of previous witnesses. Continue reading
Michaels v. CH2M Hill, Inc.
Docket No. 84168-3 Facts: Respondent Larry Michaels filed suit against petitioner CH2M Hill, Inc. in the Superior Court for Spokane County after being injured in an accident at a sewage treatment plant operated by the city of Spokane that was caused by CH2M Hill recommending, in its capacity as a consultant for a project to upgrade and retrofit the plant, that flows of heated and unheated sludge be separated. Continue reading
Rahman v. State
Docket No. 83428-8 Facts: Respondent Rizwana Rahman filed suit against the petitioner state of Washington in the Superior Court for Thurston County after being injured in an automobile accident while accompanying her husband on official state business. Continue reading
Washington v. Brousseau
Docket No. 83415-6 Facts: Petitioner William Brousseau was convicted of the rape of a child and child molestation in the Superior Court for Asotin County after a trial in which the alleged victim testified after being deemed competent following a competency hearing and in which out of court statements made by the alleged victim were admitted into evidence pursuant to Washington Revised Code §9A.44.120’s child hearsay exception. Brousseau subsequently appealed his conviction, asserting that he was denied due process of law when the trial court prevented him from calling the alleged victim to testify at the competency hearing, that §9A.44.120 requires that a child testify at their pretrial child hearsay hearing in order for their out of court statements to be admissible at trial, and that his attorney’s failure to object to testimony regarding the alleged victim’s credibility constituted ineffective assistance of counsel. Continue reading
In re personal restraint of Adolph
Docket No. 82868-7 Facts: Following petitioner Vincent Adolph’s conviction for vehicular homicide and vehicular assault in the Superior Court for Okanogan County, an enhanced sentence was imposed upon Adolph pursuant to Washington Revised Code §46.61.520(2) on grounds that Adolph had three prior convictions for driving under the influence. Continue reading
Washington v. Bunker
Docket No. 81921-1 Facts: Petitioner Leo Bunker was convicted of violating a no contact order in contravention of Washington Revised Code §26.50.110 in the Superior Court for King County after a traffic stop revealed that Lillian Hiatt, whom Bunker was prohibited by court order from contacting, was a passenger in his automobile. Continue reading