Columbia Physical Therapy, Inc. v. Benton Franklin Orthopedic Associates

Docket No. 81734-1  Facts: Petitioner Columbia Physical Therapy, Inc. filed suit against respondent Benton Franklin Orthopedic Associates in the Superior Court for Benton County, alleging violations of the corporate practice of medicine doctrine, Washington’s anti-rebate statute (Washington Revised Code §19.68), and the Consumer Protection Act (Washington Revised Code §19.86). Continue reading

G-P Gypsum Corporation v. Department of Revenue

Docket No. 81995-5  Facts: Respondent G-P Gypsum Corporation filed suit against the petitioner Department of Revenue in the Superior Court for Thurston County seeking a refund of use taxes that had been levied against it by the city of Tacoma pursuant to Washington Revised Code §82.14.230 (which permits municipalities to impose use taxes upon the use of natural gas) as a result of its use of natural gas in the process of manufacturing wallboard at its plant in Tacoma. Continue reading

Washington v. Schaler

Docket No. 81864-9  Facts: Petitioner Glen Schaler was convicted of harassment pursuant to Washington Revised Code §9A.46.020(1)(a)(i), which criminalizes threats to kill, in the Superior Court for Okanogan County after threatening to kill two of his neighbors while receiving psychiatric treatment. Continue reading

Tobin v. Department of Labor and Industries

Docket No. 81946-7  Facts: Following a workplace injury that left him permanently disabled, respondent Jim Tobin was awarded workers’ compensation by the petitioner Department of Labor and Industries as well as collected a settlement that included damages for pain and suffering from a responsible third party tortfeasor as authorized by Washington Revised Code §51.24. Continue reading

Kelly v. Chelan County

Docket No. 81855-0  Facts: Respondent Jeff Kelly filed suit against Chelan County in the Superior Court for Chelan County pursuant to the Land Use Petition Act (Washington Revised Code §36.70C.100(1)) seeking the reversal of a Chelan County hearing examiner’s decision permitting the commercial development of property along the shore of Lake Chelan. Continue reading