Munich v. Skagit Emergency Communication Center

Synopsis: Whether a county may be held liable under the special relationship exception to public duty doctrine for damages allegedly caused by a negligent response to a 911 call even though the 911 operator truthfully told the caller that a police officer had been dispatched.

Docket No. 85984-1 (from Court of Appeals Division I Case No. 64644-3)

Petitioner: Skagit Emergency Communication Center, et al.

Respondent: Gaye Diana Munich, as Personal Representative for the Estate of William R. Munich

Briefs:

Argument: Thursday, May 3, 2012 9:30am

[Source: TVW, http://tvw.org]

Audio: Washington Supreme Court

Decided: Thursday, November 1st, 2012

Prevailing Party: Gaye Diana Munich, as Personal Representative for the Estate of William R. Munich (Respondent)

Vote: 8-1

Citation: Pending

Court: Madsen3 Court (2012)

Barbara Madsen: Majority

Madsen

Charles Johnson: Majority

Johnson

ConcurrenceTom Chambers: Concurrence

Chambers
(Concurs)

Susan Owens: Majority

Owens

MajorityMary Fairhurst: Majority

Fairhurst
(Majority)

DissentJames Johnson: Dissent

Johnson
(Dissent)

Debra Stephens: Majority

Stephens

Charles Wiggins: Majority

Wiggins

Steven Gonzalez: Majority

Gonzalez

Opinion

Opinion

Concurrence

Concurrence

Dissent

Dissent

Note: We post only slip opinion(s) as published at the time of the decision. Please consult Washington Reports printed volumes for the opinion(s) in their final form. Each opinion should appear next to the Justice who authored it.