Synopsis: Did individual bank officers and employees owe a duty of care to the Annechinos, such that they may be held personally liable for breach of that duty?
Docket No. 86220-6 (from King Case No. 10-2-43108-0 KNT)
Petitioner: Michael and Theresa Annechino, husband and wife
Respondent: Michael C. Worthy and Susan Worthy, husband and wife, et al.
Briefs:
Argument: Tuesday, May 1, 2012 9:00am
[Source: TVW, http://tvw.org]
Audio: Washington Supreme Court
Decided: Thursday, October 18th, 2012
Prevailing Party: Michael C. Worthy and Susan Worthy, husband and wife, et al. (Respondent)
Vote: 9-0
Citation: Pending
Court: Madsen3 Court (2012)
Madsen
Johnson
Chambers
Owens
Fairhurst
Johnson
Stephens
Wiggins
Gonzalez
(Majority)
Opinion
Note: We post only slip opinion(s) as published at the time of the decision. Please consult Washington Reports printed volumes for the opinion(s) in their final form. Each opinion should appear next to the Justice who authored it.