Tacoma News, Inc. v. Cayce

Facts: Judge James Cayce of the Superior Court for King County presided over the taking of a deposition from a witness in a criminal trial in an empty courtroom.  In response to a motion by defense counsel, Cayce agreed to close the courtroom to non-parties.  Tacoma News, Inc., whose representatives had attempted to enter the courtroom during the deposition but were refused entry, subsequently petitioned the Supreme Court of Washington for a writ of mandamus compelling Cayce to open the deposition to the public, asserting that closing the taking of the deposition had violated both Article I §10 of the Washington State Constitution’s guarantee of the open administration of justice and the 1st Amendment to the United States Constitution’s implicit guarantee of public access to criminal trials.

Question(s):  Was the deposition subject to Article I §10’s guarantee of the open administration of justice?

Did closing the courtroom during the taking of the deposition violate the 1st Amendment’s implicit guarantee of public access to criminal trials?

Conclusion: Chief Justice Madsen’s opinion for the Court rejected Tacoma News’s petition for a writ of mandamus, concluding that discovery is not subject to Article I §10 and that the mere fact that the deposition was taken in a courtroom with a judge present due to the fact that the witness was being held in the county jail at the time did not render the deposition a judicial proceeding open to the public.  The Court also held that closing the courtroom during the taking of the deposition did not violate the 1st Amendment’s implicit guarantee of public access to criminal trials insofar as this guarantee does not extend to discovery.

Docket No. 83645-1

Petitioner: Tacoma News, Inc.

(Counsel: William Edward Holt and James Walter Beck)

Respondent: James Cayce

(Counsel: Thomas William Kuffel and Oma Lynn LaMothe)

Briefs:

Argument: Tuesday, November 9, 2010 10:00am

[Source: TVW, http://tvw.org]

Audio: Washington Supreme Court

Decided: Thursday, July 14th, 2011

Prevailing Party: James Cayce (Respondent)

Vote: 7-2

Citation: Pending

Court: Madsen1 Court (2010-2011)

MajorityBarbara Madsen: Majority

Madsen
(Majority)

Charles Johnson: Majority

Johnson

DissentGerry Alexander: Dissent

Alexander
(Dissent)

Richard Sanders: Dissent

Sanders

Tom Chambers: Majority

Chambers

Susan Owens: Majority

Owens

Mary Fairhurst: Majority

Fairhurst

James Johnson: Majority

Johnson

Debra Stephens: Majority

Stephens

Note: We post only slip opinion(s) as published at the time of the decision. Please consult Washington Reports printed volumes for the opinion(s) in their final form. Each opinion should appear next to the Justice who authored it.