In re Pers. Restraint of VanDelft v. State

by

Synopsis: Whether the judgment and sentence in this case became final after the decision in Blakely v. Washington, and if so, whether Blakely applies to an exceptional sentence consisting of consecutive standard range terms.

Docket No. 77733-1 (from Court of Appeals Division III Case No. 23788-5)

Petitioner: William VanDelft

Respondent: State

Other Parties: In re Pers. Restraint of VanDelft, William VanDelft (petitioner); State (respondent)

Argument: Tuesday, May 9, 2006 3:00pm

[Source: TVW, http://tvw.org]

Audio: Washington Supreme Court

Decision: Pending

Gerry Alexander: None

Alexander

Charles Johnson: None

Johnson

Barbara Madsen: None

Madsen

Richard Sanders: None

Sanders

Bobbe Bridge: None

Bridge

Tom Chambers: None

Chambers

Susan Owens: None

Owens

Mary Fairhurst: None

Fairhurst

James Johnson: None

Johnson

Note: We post only slip opinion(s) as published at the time of the decision. Please consult Washington Reports printed volumes for the opinion(s) in their final form.