Cashmere Valley Bank v. Brender

Synopsis: Under the federal Truth in Lending Act loans for personal, family, and household purposes are subject to disclosure requirements; those primarily for business, commercial, or agricultural purposes are exempt. By what method should Washington courts determine whether an extension of credit is primarily for business or commercial purposes?

Docket No. 77708-0 (from Court of Appeals Division II Case No. 31775-3)

Petitioner: Terry B. Brender

Respondent: Cashmere Valley Bank

Argument: Tuesday, September 12, 2006 3:00pm

[Source: TVW, http://tvw.org]

Audio: Washington Supreme Court

Decision: Pending

Gerry Alexander: None

Alexander

Charles Johnson: None

Johnson

Barbara Madsen: None

Madsen

Richard Sanders: None

Sanders

Bobbe Bridge: None

Bridge

Tom Chambers: None

Chambers

Susan Owens: None

Owens

Mary Fairhurst: None

Fairhurst

James Johnson: None

Johnson

Note: We post only slip opinion(s) as published at the time of the decision. Please consult Washington Reports printed volumes for the opinion(s) in their final form.