Docket No. 200,983-2 (from WSBA Case No. #10719) Continue reading
Daily Archives: Thursday, May 3, 2012
Cregan v. Fourth Memorial Church
Docket No. 86835-2 (from Spokane Case No. 10-2-00572-7)
Synopsis: Whether the recreational use immunity statute, RCW 4.24.200-210, which protects landowners from tort liability if they allow free public use of their land for recreational purposes, applies to a private camp that ordinarily charges a fee for use but in this instance allowed a group to use the facility for free.
Synopsis: Whether the recreational use immunity statute, RCW 4.24.200-210, which protects landowners from tort liability if they allow free public use of their land for recreational purposes, applies to a private camp that ordinarily charges a fee for use but in this instance allowed a group to use the facility for free.
Munich v. Skagit Emergency Communication Center
Docket No. 85984-1 (from Court of Appeals Division I Case No. 64644-3)
Synopsis: Whether a county may be held liable under the special relationship exception to public duty doctrine for damages allegedly caused by a negligent response to a 911 call even though the 911 operator truthfully told the caller that a police officer had been dispatched.
Synopsis: Whether a county may be held liable under the special relationship exception to public duty doctrine for damages allegedly caused by a negligent response to a 911 call even though the 911 operator truthfully told the caller that a police officer had been dispatched.
State v. Boyd
Docket No. 86709-7
Synopsis: Joshua Boyd was convicted of violating a protection order and was sentenced to terms of confinement and community custody that together exceeded the 60-month statutory maximum for the offense.
Synopsis: Joshua Boyd was convicted of violating a protection order and was sentenced to terms of confinement and community custody that together exceeded the 60-month statutory maximum for the offense.
The Supreme Court granted review in part and, in a per curiam opinion, remanded for resentencing (or amendment of the community custody term) consistent with RCW 9.94A.701(9).