Home > 2010 Arguments, Spring 2010 > State v. Ish

State v. Ish

Synopsis: Whether the prosecutor in a criminal trial improperly vouched for a witness’s credibility when on direct examination the prosecutor elicited the fact that the witness had promised to testify truthfully as part of a plea agreement.

Docket No. 83308-7

Petitioner: Nathaniel J. Ish

Respondent: State of Washington

Briefs:

Argued: Tuesday, June 29, 2010 2:30pm

No Flash support available

[Source: TVW, http://www.tvw.org/]

Audio: File


Decided: Pending

Barbara Madsen: None

Madsen

Charles Johnson: None

Johnson

Gerry Alexander: None

Alexander

Richard Sanders: None

Sanders

Tom Chambers: None

Chambers

Susan Owens: None

Owens

Mary Fairhurst: None

Fairhurst

James Johnson: None

Johnson

Debra Stephens: None

Stephens

Comments are closed.