Washington v. Griffith

Docket No. 79883-4 (from Court of Appeals Division III Case No. 24389-3)  Facts: Petitioner Joan Griffith pled guilty to possessing stolen property in the second degree in the Superior Court for Spokane County after attempting to sell jewelry that had been stolen in a burglary. The trial court subsequently ordered Griffith to pay restitution in the amount of the value of the stolen jewelry that had not been recovered ($11,500). Continue reading

Washington v. Patton

Docket No. 80518-1 (from Court of Appeals Division II Case No. 34025-9)  Facts: Petitioner Randall Patton was charged with unlawful possession of a controlled substance as a result of sheriff’s deputies attempt to effectuate an arrest warrant for Patton while he stood in his driveway next to his parked car with his head in the window. When the deputy told Patton he was under arrest, Patton fled from the car into his home, where several law enforcement officers physically detained him. Continue reading

Miller v. Campbell

Docket No. 80276-9 (from Court of Appeals Division I Case No. 56736-5)  Facts: Alleging that his late stepfather Patrick Campbell had sexually abused him over the course of several years during his childhood, respondent Michael Miller filed suit against Campbell’s estate in the Superior Court for Snohomish County. The estate subsequently filed a motion for summary judgment on grounds that Miller was estopped from pursuing the claim due to the fact that he had failed to list the claim as an asset during bankruptcy proceedings. Continue reading

Mutual of Enumclaw Insurance Company v. T & G Construction, Inc.

Docket No. 80420-6 (from Court of Appeals Division I Case No. 57679-8)  Facts: The Villas at Harbour Pointe Owners Association filed suit against petitioner T & G Construction, Inc. in the Superior Court for Snohomish County after siding that T & G Construction had installed was found to be defective. After T & G Construction reached a settlement with the Villas at Harbour Pointe Owners Association and the parties sought a reasonableness determination from the superior court, respondent Mutual of Enumclaw Insurance Company, T & G Construction’s insurer, appeared at the subsequent reasonableness hearing and objected Continue reading